http://jp.techcrunch.com/archives/20081103google-may-hate-prop-8-but-that-doesnt-mean-they-wont-serve-ads-supporting-it/ 次世代のウェブ社会に影響を与えるベンチャー企業・新サービス・スクープねたを毎日リアルタイムで綴るブログ‐TechCrunchの日本語版サイト Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:51:07 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://jp.techcrunch.com/archives/20081103google-may-hate-prop-8-but-that-doesnt-mean-they-wont-serve-ads-supporting-it/comment-page-1/#comment-529178 Joseph T. Macias Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:24:13 +0000 http://jp.techcrunch.com/?p=8535#comment-529178 It's no one's business who I marry in a civil ceremony and I have been damaged financially and more due to laws which keep changing about my domestic partnership (or no laws at all) which make my basic civil rights inferior to yours. But more importantly, Google, as well as any business, publication, or organization should now have the consciousness and clear notification that they cannot do business with people who are committing fraud and who, frankly, are worse than theives or the KKK. They hide and manipulate and stay within the letter of the law to fundamentally change government and literally "DE"-grade one arbitrary slice of the population. And they claim it is to project their daughter or son from knowing I exist. So the Google Corporation's slow or no action and then excuses and "improvements" are criminally similar to a chain manufacturer supplying shackles to slave traders. They know perfectly well how their product is being used while it is damaging to society on a higher plane than whether it's simply legal or "a confusing issue" or "complicated" or "we'll do better next time". If Google doesn't stand up to their own greed, then I guess they'll let any smaller minority suffer just to get a buck from the majority? It’s no one’s business who I marry in a civil ceremony and I have been damaged financially and more due to laws which keep changing about my domestic partnership (or no laws at all) which make my basic civil rights inferior to yours. But more importantly, Google, as well as any business, publication, or organization should now have the consciousness and clear notification that they cannot do business with people who are committing fraud and who, frankly, are worse than theives or the KKK. They hide and manipulate and stay within the letter of the law to fundamentally change government and literally “DE”-grade one arbitrary slice of the population. And they claim it is to project their daughter or son from knowing I exist.
So the Google Corporation’s slow or no action and then excuses and “improvements” are criminally similar to a chain manufacturer supplying shackles to slave traders. They know perfectly well how their product is being used while it is damaging to society on a higher plane than whether it’s simply legal or “a confusing issue” or “complicated” or “we’ll do better next time”. If Google doesn’t stand up to their own greed, then I guess they’ll let any smaller minority suffer just to get a buck from the majority?

]]> http://jp.techcrunch.com/archives/20081103google-may-hate-prop-8-but-that-doesnt-mean-they-wont-serve-ads-supporting-it/comment-page-1/#comment-528881 IMVUの広告がちょっとキワドイ Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:17:32 +0000 http://jp.techcrunch.com/?p=8535#comment-528881 [...] この広告映像はUstreamで見つけられたのだが、Ustreamでは、わいせつあるいは「ポルノ、性愛、幼児ポルノ、幼児性愛」を含むコンテンツは禁止されている。私が見る限り、どれにもあてはまらないと思うが、［同性婚禁止法案］Prop 8の支持者たちの意見は違うかもしれない。 [...] [...] この広告映像はUstreamで見つけられたのだが、Ustreamでは、わいせつあるいは「ポルノ、性愛、幼児ポルノ、幼児性愛」を含むコンテンツは禁止されている。私が見る限り、どれにもあてはまらないと思うが、［同性婚禁止法案］Prop 8の支持者たちの意見は違うかもしれない。 [...]

]]> http://jp.techcrunch.com/archives/20081103google-may-hate-prop-8-but-that-doesnt-mean-they-wont-serve-ads-supporting-it/comment-page-1/#comment-528703 satomi Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:16:15 +0000 http://jp.techcrunch.com/?p=8535#comment-528703 「も」を太字で挿入しました、ありがとうございます！ 「も」を太字で挿入しました、ありがとうございます！

]]> http://jp.techcrunch.com/archives/20081103google-may-hate-prop-8-but-that-doesnt-mean-they-wont-serve-ads-supporting-it/comment-page-1/#comment-528698 読者 Tue, 04 Nov 2008 09:53:52 +0000 http://jp.techcrunch.com/?p=8535#comment-528698 記事終盤に "掲載禁じて正解だと私は思う" という文章がありますが、これだと Google は問題の広告をすでに掲載拒否しているように読めてしまいます。原文は "I believe they would be correct in banning it" ですが、"掲載を拒否してもその行為は正当化されると私は思う" みたいな感じにしたほうがいいんじゃないでしょうか。英語が得意なわけではないので読みちがえていたらすいません。 記事終盤に “掲載禁じて正解だと私は思う” という文章がありますが、これだと Google は問題の広告をすでに掲載拒否しているように読めてしまいます。原文は “I believe they would be correct in banning it” ですが、”掲載を拒否してもその行為は正当化されると私は思う” みたいな感じにしたほうがいいんじゃないでしょうか。英語が得意なわけではないので読みちがえていたらすいません。

]]>